Establish the plant basis
Define the unit, assessment boundary, target coverage and the Fire & Gas credit already being claimed.
Verification method
Every verdict hasa chain of custody.
Barrier Intelligence connects each conclusion back to the source document, spatial assumption, physical scenario and detector response that produced it. The result can be checked, challenged and signed.
The golden path
Six controlled steps. No unexplained jump from input to claim.
The three stages, Reconstruct, Sweep and Verdict, expand into six controlled steps. The system accelerates the engineering work while keeping the judgement visible and reviewable.
Audit the inputs
Parse the HAZOP, LOPA, philosophy, register, mapping report and drawings with page-level provenance.
Reconstruct the spatial case
Align leak nodes, detector coordinates, obstructions and voting logic to the 3D plant model.
Sweep credible physics
Test releases across wind direction, speed, stability and geometry-driven dispersion behaviour.
Apply the credit wall
Allow only physical performance to earn credit; evidence confidence can demote a verdict but never promote it.
Issue the assurance package
Export the register, overlays, gaps, remediation priorities, method and limitations for engineer sign-off.
Three kinds of truth
The method resolves the basis, the physics and the credit.
Each stage answers a different question before the barrier verdict can be trusted.
Reconstruct the claim
Turn scenarios, assumptions and detector data into a structured basis without losing the document, page or revision behind each fact.
Sweep credible reality
Test release behaviour through the plant geometry, detector field and full relevant wind space instead of relying on nominal reach.
Issue the credit verdict
Let demonstrated detector response determine the state, then retain limitations, evidence quality and engineering authority around it.
Two coordinated engines
One understands the basis. The other tests the plant.
Neither document extraction nor simulation is treated as sufficient on its own.
01 · Document Intelligence
Structure the engineering claim before testing it.
The document engine finds scenarios, detector assumptions, voting claims and risk-reduction credit without obscuring the original source.
- ADeterministic parsing and source-page citations
- BConflict, omission and confidence flags
- CHuman review before a scenario is admitted
02 · Spatial and physics
Test whether the hardware earns that claim.
The spatial engine resolves the relationship between the release, plant geometry, detector field and time-to-detect.
- AScenario and full wind-space sweep
- BObstruction, shadowing and channelling
- CPhysical detector votes bound to scenarios
Solver selection
Assure3D uses the fastest method that can still defend the decision; the qualified solver always owns the final verdict.
The credit wall
Automation can organise the evidence. It cannot award itself assurance credit.
Barrier Intelligence separates calculation from engineering authority so the final claim stays honest.
Physics decides
Only demonstrated detector response can earn a credited state.
Confidence can only demote
Weak or conflicting evidence moves a result toward caution, never optimism.
An engineer signs
The method, limitations and final disposition remain visible to the qualified reviewer.
See the output
Follow the chain from a credited scenario to the evidence that supports it.
The evidence model is designed for technical review, audit and sign-off.
Explore the evidence